![]() ![]() That subset embedding takes far less kb than a collection of pixels for each and every glyph each and every time that glyph is used. Embed once and use as often as needed, no extra file weight (kb). Each time a is used, the pdf refers to the embedded glyph. Vector type in PDFs is often comprised of an embedded subset of the original font. One thing you will absolutely realize is a 5x8" PDF containing type in vector form is going to be remarkably smaller in file size (kb) than a 5x8" PDF containing a single raster image. The best you can do is try it and see if the rasterization is a problem for your images/project. You can also use the Marquee tool on the top toolbar to draw a box around the text. It's not possible to be definitive in stating either "yes" or "no" here. Use your mouse or trackpad to highlight the text that you want to clear up. ![]() Whether or not something "shows any loss" depends upon the actual image(s), desired final usage, or future alterations. That being posted, there may be little loss in quality if the PPI of the rasterized image is high enough and suits output desires. which stroke to draw first in what direction, then second, etc.) (Hinting dictates to output devices how a type glyph should be drawn not merely its shape - i.e. Hinting is not typically a major issue above 12pt type, but it's something to be aware of. Rasterized type can lose much more than simple vector outline data, it can also lose hinting data for the type. Type specifically can suffer when rasterized depending upon its' size. But this depends greatly on the content of any image(s). Raster images can be lower quality than vector images, since vector images are resolution independent. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |